It is presumptive of us to sit in judgment of Evolution when we don't
have all the facts. Remember that science is always evolving our
understanding of the way things *really* work.
You know, whether Jesus was deity or man is really irrelevant! He still
changed the world for the better and he was exactly right about love and
tolerance being the answer. @:D>
Gary VanderMolen wrote:
At 03:49 PM 22/12/2005, Gary VanderMolen wrote:
Of course we are supposed to use the (limited) logic we have. Even
ants have logic, but can you explain the theory of relativity to an
ant?
Humans may be a little smarter than ants, but our capability to
understand things like higher dimensions is very limited.
But I've never said to an ant "Act this way, and I'll get you into
heaven." Plus we were given reason, the ability to discern between
good and evil.
And your point is...?
That your argument that one can't compare the relationship between an
ant and a human and the supposed relationship between man and god.
My argument is that the difference in intelligence level between man
and ant is at least as large as the difference between man and God.
Since it's no surprise that the ant can't understand man's designs,
so likewise it should be no surprise that man can't fully understand or
appreciate God's designs.
Saying that ants don't understand what we are doing (which is a
conclusion you have no proof of, btw) and therefore we shouldn't
expect to have any understanding of god makes no sense, and isn't an
argument.
I never said that we don't have any understanding of God.
Our understanding of him is limited, because humans are not omniscient.
It is presumptive of us to sit in judgment of God when we don't have
all the facts.
Gary VanderMolen
