j.,
I just do not get your reference to telnet.
I will go to your links supplied and see what's what.
As far as your helpful "logging" instructions, I am sorry to say that they
are way so far over my head! I am NOT a DOS/? programmer at all........But,
I will create a dot-txt file to capture your share and ttry to
decode/fill-in as I can.
At this point, I could be dreadfully under-educated. JMHO.
Best,
Duncan
At 08:47 05/19/2009 -0700, you wrote:
Normally I'd say if you can telnet in & the commands by hand, then that's
the best
test IMO and how I diagnosed Comcast's servers track down an issue sending
mail whem Jim lost DNS resolution for hardwaregroup.com. With SSL, I don't
think you can do that and any router issues would affect more than one
email client software.
There is a logging process for TB as spelled
out here:
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Session_logging_for_mail/news#Methods_for_logging
https://wiki.mozilla.org/MailNews:Logging
Since I already use TB via batch file to kludge windows fraked up global
TEMP variables, I just added the logging variables to it.
@echo off
set temp=p:\temp
set tmp=p:\temp
REM log POP3, SMTP, IMAP traffic
set NSPR_LOG_MODULES=POP3:4,SMTP:4,IMAP:4
set NSPR_LOG_FILE=%temp%\tbird_log.txt
pushd "%programfiles%\mozilla thunderbird"
start "" /W "thunderbird.exe"
popd
start "notepad" "%temp%\tbird_log.txt"
DHSinclair wrote:
JRS,
Thank you for the shout. Yes, what you shared is how I have both Eudora
and Thunderbird set up.
Eudora rcvs email , but records error(s) with each interchange.
Thunderbird simply errors immediately on "check" w/o rcvng any email.
I will again triple-check my program settings.
Is there a possibility that my router might be intercepting/screwing with
this new use of SSL and/or ports 465 and 995? I will also re-scan my
router's activity log........... :)
As jmaccraw suggested, I suspect that there may be yet another device in
the chain that is not yet playing nice. Still checking.
I did fully expect this situation to happen BTW. I have never had good
relations with ATT; and, why my first xdsl use back in SoCal was after
Verizon bought/absorbed General Telephone.
I needed something else to do today anyway. LOL!
Best,
Duncan
At 21:28 05/18/2009 -0700, you wrote:
Not sure why you can't connect, they did this to all their customers
in the last coupla years..
I am at 'pacbell.net', yet my settings are thus with the new ATT
stuff.........
'pop.att.yahoo.com' for the pop server..........
'smtp.att.yahoo.com' for the smtp server.........
port '995' for pop, and 'use ssl' has to be checked now............
port '465' for smtp, and 'use ssl' needs to be used there too..
Password authentication is needed for both........
No more basic port 25 stuff is allowed, they don't want outsiders to
be able to simply connect to use their services for spam
forwarding......
This page has settings for all the various ISP's ATT swallowed up,
including Bellsouth..... :)
http://helpme.att.net/article.php?item=287
On May 18, 2009, at 4:01 PM, DHSinclair wrote:
Latest Thunderbird test inline............
At 19:18 05/17/2009 -0700, you wrote:
snip
For fun I'd being trying OE (just to test). As to Thunderbird not
working I find that highly suspect and would guess there's
something wrong with it's setup.
OK. My Thunderbird settings are wrong.
When I open I get an immediate:
/Alert/
"Mail Server does not support secure authentication."
I suppose this means I AM going thru a proxy?
Only because ATT/Bellsouth 'says' that I NEED to now use secure
authentication. To which, I read using the new ports and "SSL."
Where have I gone south?
Other than the "Secure Authentication" settings of TBird to back off
of, any additional help?
Thanks,
Duncan
