What's better? pfSENSE or M0n0wall? -----Original Message----- From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Greg Sevart Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 4:00 PM To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com Subject: Re: [H] 1000 Mbps vs 100 Mpbs????
1. That's why I run the N in N-only mode and have another b/g WAP in a non-overlapping channel. Same basic concept as dual radio. Point remains that you can exceed 100mbit on N gear fairly easily. 2. Yes, compared to the features, robustness, and performance of pfSense, dd-wrt based appliances are garbage. To suggest otherwise is "loony". > -----Original Message----- > From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware- > boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of maccrawj > Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 7:23 AM > To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com > Subject: Re: [H] 1000 Mbps vs 100 Mpbs???? > > 1. If you don't run a 2 radio setup, then non-N devices will kill the 240mb > speed. > 2. Garbage, LOL, OK next loony please! > > > On 5/9/2010 11:07 PM, Greg Sevart wrote: > > I've pushed over 240mbit/s on my D-Link DIR-655 N "router" (which I > > use as nothing more than an AP) and an Intel 5300 NIC. You don't have > > to run dual frequency, but that was with a double (40MHz) channel. > > > > I know that the dd-wrt project is quite popular, but for router and/or > > firewall duties, think they're all garbage compared to pfSense....but > > will allow that I have a complex setup with unusual requirements.
