I see. Very interesting.
But if I wanted a pfSense box, then that would make my router redundant. I would have to just use it as an AP right? -----Original Message----- From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Greg Sevart Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 4:14 PM To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com Subject: Re: [H] 1000 Mbps vs 100 Mpbs???? pfSense was forked from m0n0wall several years ago to provide expanded features not consistent with m0n0wall's minimalist approach suitable to smaller, embedded systems. It also uses the (IMO) more robust and less quirky BSD packet filter (pf) instead of ipfw. They offer a similar interface and either one should be fairly familiar if you've used the other. > -----Original Message----- > From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware- > boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Naushad, Zulfiqar > Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 8:03 AM > To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com > Subject: Re: [H] 1000 Mbps vs 100 Mpbs???? > > What's better? pfSENSE or M0n0wall? > >
