On 27/02/06, Jean-frederic Clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > > > > But that's way different than APR for the class lib portlib. > > So you have to create a apr.IA32 class lib, don't you?
Well, that's what I was thinking - though I'm not so sure that $arch should be something that specific. Initially at least I don't think we should be making a choice between using apr.IA32 and writing platform specific natives. I think we should continue with what we have until such a time that apr becomes the better choice. So what we'd need now is a mechanism to override the automatic choice of "platform". I wouldn't be too surprised if someone decided to create "platforms" for the other two (?) choices of windows implementation - cygwin native and cygwin w/o cygwin.dll. It might be useful to develop some tests to prove the natives for platforms that don't yet have VM support. Regards, Mark. -- Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> IBM Java Technology Centre, UK.
