Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Hello
I'd like to bring this thread back.
Number of tests is growing and it is time to put them in order.
So far we may have:
1) implementation-specific tests that designed to be run from bootclasspath
2) implementation-specific tests that might be run from classpath
3) implementation-specific tests that designed to be run from classpath
4) implementation-independent tests that designed to be run from bootclasspath
5) implementation-independent tests that might be run from classpath
6) implementation-independent tests that designed to be run from classpath
I think there is no "might".
Also we seem to have the following packages, where the tests are:
1) the same package as implementation
2) org.apache.harmony.tests.[the same package as implementation]
3) tests.api.[the same package as implementation]
I suggest that we work out step-by-step solution as we could not reach
an agreement for the general universal one
yes!
So for the first step I suggest that we separate i-independent tests
that must or may be run from classpath
yes!
I suggest that we put them into package
tests.module.compatible.[package of implementation being tested]
No!
I think we should keep org.apache.harmony as the prefix for the package
namespace so we don't collide or get confused with others...
geir
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
