Hi Alexei
Why do you think that your proposed style:
public Object get(Object oldInstance) {
ObjectNode node;
Object result;
if (oldInstance == null) {
return null;
}
node = nodes.get(oldInstance);
result = getValue(node);
return result;
}
is more transparent than original one:
public Object get(Object oldInstance) {
if(oldInstance == null) {
return null;
}
ObjectNode node = (ObjectNode) nodes.get(oldInstance);
Object result = getValue(node);
return result;
}
I'd rather change it something like this way:
public Object get(Object oldInstance) {
if(oldInstance == null) {
return null;
}
return getValue( (ObjectNode) nodes.get(oldInstance) );
}
At least I'd get rid of the 'result' variable
Thanks,
Mikhail
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]