Hi Alexei

Why do you think that your proposed style:
   public Object get(Object oldInstance) {
       ObjectNode node;
       Object result;

       if (oldInstance == null) {
           return null;
       }

       node = nodes.get(oldInstance);
       result = getValue(node);

       return result;
   }

is more transparent than original one:
   public Object get(Object oldInstance) {
       if(oldInstance == null) {
           return null;
       }

       ObjectNode node = (ObjectNode) nodes.get(oldInstance);
       Object result = getValue(node);
       return result;
   }


I'd rather change it something like this way:
   public Object get(Object oldInstance) {
       if(oldInstance == null) {
           return null;
       }

       return getValue( (ObjectNode) nodes.get(oldInstance) );
   }
At least I'd get rid of the 'result' variable


Thanks,
Mikhail

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to