2006/8/8, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Alexey Petrenko wrote: > 2006/8/8, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> hmm...of course we can get a workaround for now by providing separate >> build for win2k. But I think it would be nice if we can have a common >> win32 release(at least because RI has), it's just a little weird if we >> don't... > Anyway we should limit number of supported old Windows versions. > Because Win9x for example does not have a huge number API functions. > And if we will try to be compatible with them it will make life for us > much harder. > And what benefits will we get from this? What is the percentage of Win9x > users? I don't think anyone would suggest supporting Win9x :)
But we should limit number of supported Windows version and post it on Harmony site. Because "win32" is too wide here. SY, Alexey -- Alexey A. Petrenko Intel Middleware Products Division --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
