On 10/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We're a volunteer project, so "supported" is based on interest in > community. Lets be clear by writing down a set of platforms that we as > a community commit to support. > > I think we can define "support" as - "one or more people in the > community tests on that platform on a regular basis, there are users > that use that platform, and we have people volunteering to find and fix > bugs that specifically affect that platform" > > Just throw things out there and we'll gather the results and see what's > popular. We'll summarize in 3 days. Please be clear in indicating what > you think should be reported. Don't vote against anything. To start, > using a broad brush : > > > Windows > ======= > Windows XP x86 > > Linux > ===== > Ubuntu 6 x86 > Ubuntu 5 x86 > RHEL (version ?) x86 > FC (version ?) x86 > SUSE (verion ?) x86
My RHEL version is 2.6.9. I have a SUSE version 11. On Windows, I would suggest both XP and Windows Server 2003. Toolchains are a somewhat othogonal topic, I think. As Mikhail points out, we may want to clarify the minimum machine model ( Pentium III in x86 case ). I think we also de facto decided to support EM64T and IPF on Linux on other threads. When Vista is out, we should support it both on 32 and 64 bit.
