2006/10/17, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2006/10/17, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Rana Dasgupta wrote: > > On 10/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> So since I don't have Win 2003, I gotta just commit and let someone else > >> test? > >> > >> Any committer have win 2003? > > > > > > I think that it may be hard to find a test at this point that fails on > > Windows Server 2003, but passes on XP. But perf etc. characteristics > > will be > > different. At some point, gc_v5 etc. is likely to have server specific > > variations, eg., parallel gc may be on server only. > > > > Are we talking of tests in general? I am sorry, but I may not have > > understood the comment. > > There is a test that demonstrates a Win 2003 bug... I can just commit > it and let someone confirm since I don't have a win 2003 machine It would be nice if Gregory confirmed that Win XP and Win 2003 machines which he compared have identical HW - this might be multicore vs single-CPU (HT does not count) specific rather than OS? Gregory?
The ones that I have are different. XP is on laptop with a single CPU, the server is on P4 with HT enabled. Actually it wasn't me who discovered the problem on 2003 server, it was Elena who created HARMONY-1669. -- Gregory Shimansky, Intel Middleware Products Division
