Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > My thinking is that we should support the convention, but we're also > trying to create another convention with VMI. > > Would the vmi.dll be usable by other implementors?
Not really, since implementers have to hold on to our VMI function struct from the JavaVM / JNIEnv, and we can't write that portably (across implementations). Regards, Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK.
