ok... Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:My thinking is that we should support the convention, but we're also trying to create another convention with VMI.Would the vmi.dll be usable by other implementors?Not really, since implementers have to hold on to our VMI function struct from the JavaVM / JNIEnv, and we can't write that portably (across implementations). Regards, Tim
