"Chris Saunders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It seems to me that this .Net thingy is a runtime and therefore > could potentially be as portable as anything from Java. Potentially, yes. > This runtime just needs to be ported to other operating systems > similarily to the Java runtime. So it's a question of either source availability - or at least a very complete specification - or Microsoft strategy. -kzm -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Eduardo Nahum Ochs
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Lennart Augustsson
- RE: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Brent Fulgham
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Erik Meijer
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Erik Meijer
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime "Jürgen A. Erhard"
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Antony Courtney
- RE: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Ketil Malde
- RE: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Doug Ransom
- RE: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Doug Ransom
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Erik Meijer
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Nigel Perry
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Theodore Norvell
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Nigel Perry
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Claus Reinke
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Craig Dickson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Ketil Malde