>> >> >> >>>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-eps-08#section-5.3 >> >>>Expect to see ND Proxy from mobile networks. >> >> Thanks much for the reference. But the reference is still an I-D and >> not RFC. RFC 4389 is on Experimental Track. One reason this document > >The status does not matter. This I-D adds nothing new, it just puts >what's already ratified in the 3GPP and practiced by operators and >implementors into IETF speak. The I-D is just for your convenience to >understand what is going on in 3GPP and mobile. > >CB
All, Cameron is noting a very important point. Draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-eps-08 is a reflection of existing standards work in the 3GPP. Expect to see real products using functions based on those standards. I think (personally) that it would behoove us to address this. Given the overall growth of Wireline (Cell) endpoints, it will represent a non-trivial number of endpoints to consider - IMHO. Regards, Victor K > >> could be gated in the IESG or IETF Last Call is by folks saying "you >> have asked for ND Proxy" but there is no Standards Track RFC that >> specifies an ND Proxy. My personal belief is to never enforce any >> specific tech on anyone. Let folks use whatever they want to use. >> However, we have to see what is technically feasible or not. >> >> Regards, >> >> Hemant >> >_______________________________________________ >homenet mailing list >homenet@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
