>>>>> "Mattia" == Mattia Rossi <mattia.rossi.mailingli...@gmail.com> writes:
Mattia> to the following text:
Mattia> The home network needs to be adaptable to such ISP policies, and
thus
Mattia> make no assumptions about the stability of the prefix received from
Mattia> an ISP, or the length of the prefix that may be offered. However,
if
Mattia> only a /64 is offered by the ISP, the homenet may be severely
Mattia> constrained. Attempting to use subnet prefixes longer than /64
Mattia> would break SLAAC, and is thus not recommended. Using ULA prefixes
Mattia> internally with NPTv6 at the boundary would be possible, but is not
Mattia> recommended for reasons given elsewhere. Reverting to bridging would
Mattia> destroy subnetting, breaks multicast if bridged onto 802.11 wireless
Mattia> networks and has serious limitations with regard to heterogeneous
Mattia> link layer technologies and LLNs. For those reasons it is
recommended
Mattia> that DHCP-PD or OSPFv3 capable routers have the ability to issue a
warning
Mattia> upon receipt of a /64 if required to assign further prefixes within
Mattia> the home network as described in Section 3.4.3.
+1
--
Michael Richardson
-on the road-
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
