>>>>> "Mattia" == Mattia Rossi <mattia.rossi.mailingli...@gmail.com> writes:
    Mattia> to the following text:

    Mattia> The home network needs to be adaptable to such ISP policies, and 
thus
    Mattia> make no assumptions about the stability of the prefix received from
    Mattia> an ISP, or the length of the prefix that may be offered.  However, 
if
    Mattia> only a /64 is offered by the ISP, the homenet may be severely
    Mattia> constrained. Attempting to use subnet prefixes longer than /64
    Mattia> would break SLAAC, and is thus not recommended. Using ULA prefixes
    Mattia> internally with NPTv6 at the boundary would be possible, but is not
    Mattia> recommended for reasons given elsewhere. Reverting to bridging would
    Mattia> destroy subnetting, breaks multicast if bridged onto 802.11 wireless
    Mattia> networks and has serious limitations with regard to heterogeneous
    Mattia> link layer technologies and LLNs. For those reasons it is 
recommended
    Mattia> that DHCP-PD or OSPFv3 capable routers have the ability to issue a 
warning
    Mattia> upon receipt of a /64 if required to assign further prefixes within
    Mattia> the home network as described in Section 3.4.3.

+1

-- 
Michael Richardson
-on the road-

Attachment: pgpmQRWYrG9LF.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to