Hi all,

Every time this comes up I refer back to a snippet from Gunther Schuller's 
book...

>From Schuller: Horn Technique - "A common misconception exists that staccato 
>playing requires a different technical approach than more sustained playing. 
>Nothing could be further from the truth. Essentially, a staccato note is 
>produced exactly like any other note; that is to say, a clean attack (in 
>staccato fairly sharp and pointed) is followed by a fully centered tone and 
>ended quickly by the action of the larynx. Common faults in staccato playing 
>are: a) the attack, because of the speed with which the tongue is required to 
>move, is often fuzzy and unfocused; b)the tone, because of its relative 
>brevity, is neglected and allowed to sound thin and pinched; and c) the 
>tongue, rather than the larynx, is used to stop the note.  This latter fault 
>gives the note an unpleasantly abrupt ending and makes the staccato sound 
>choppy and aggressive. For my taste, the most attractive staccato in one in 
>which each note is ever so slightly tapered at the end."

Robert N. Ward
Principal Horn
San Francisco Symphony
[email protected]





On Jul 2, 2011, at 1:48 PM, Ralph Hall wrote:

> Wendell, I reply to your posting out of courtesy because I realise  
> that it is to your advice that many on this list look to. However, I  
> must take issue with you on one or two points. My reply, which brought  
> up the 'whole glottal thing' was specifically concerned with the  
> ending of notes other than staccato and you seem to extrapolate from  
> that, via those that seek our help, that I advocate stopping short  
> notes with the glottis. This is certainly not my way of thinking but  
> you then go on to say that articulations (which exactly?) should be  
> 'small actions of the tongue and not a lot of throat stuff'. I never  
> have, nor ever will conflate 'articulations' with a 'lot of throat  
> stuff' so I wonder where this comes from?
> 
> In your reply to William you say that 'you are right to think that  
> stopping each note with the tongue would be a bad thing in a fast  
> passage' but in your second posting you advocate 'toot' or 'teet'  
> which to my mind, if you pronounce the last consonant in normal  
> pronunciation, means ending the note with the tongue. I certainly  
> accept your advocacy of the vowel sound between the two 'ts' otherwise  
> you do get more tongue than note. There are not many linguistic and  
> elocution experts, or (heaven forbid!), singing teachers who would  
> agree that pronouncing with the tongue 'and suitable vowel sounds' can  
> take the throat (presumably you mean the glottis) out of the equation.
> 
> Ultimately, Valerie is right that there is more than one way of  
> cracking a nut, but an acknowledgement of the skills of others in  
> solving these universal problems might render the list more helpful to  
> those who seek advice.
> 
> Ralph R. Hall

_______________________________________________
post: [email protected]
unsubscribe or set options at 
https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org

Reply via email to