Hi Satoshi,
Yes. My fault for delaying this but now done. Hence Josh' announcement.
I am happy that:
* The provider is aware of what we will do with their imagery and data
derived from it.
* The provider has given their explicit permission to include derived
data into the OSM database.
* The proposed attribution mechanism, adding source to tags and/or
change sets is practical, (the imagery will only be released in the
context of HOT projects). I have also added a new section for HOT
under http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution .
Mike
LWG
On 22/11/2014 01:15, Satoshi IIDA wrote:
Hello,
As my understanding, using Skybox imagery is a task for LWG currently.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071318.html
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071320.html
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-October/071295.html
Are there any progress since the discussion?
2014-11-22 8:43 GMT+09:00 Pat Tressel <ptres...@myuw.net
<mailto:ptres...@myuw.net>>:
Josh --
As some of you may be aware, we recently announced the Skybox
for Good
<http://www.skyboximaging.com/blog/introducing-skybox-for-good>program.
We know that some of this imagery can be especially useful in
Crisis Response situations, and therefore we are explicitly
authorizing usage of Skybox for Good imagery in any current
HOT Activation
<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HOT_activation>, under the
condition that changesets and/or features that are derived
from Skybox for Good imagery and committed to OSM are
attributed to Skybox.
That's fantastic news!!
Ok, folks, who gets to send the formal Thank You....? I bet
that's the communications working group. And I also bet it's safe
to infer a whole bunch of individual thank-yous. ;-)
This could, for example, include the method of attributing
Skybox as the "source", or a similar method deemed appropriate
by HOT.
We had that older thread about imagery tagging, where it came down
to "source" (used since forever) and the new, automatically-added
"imagery_used" tag in iD, which, it was pointed out, might not be
accurate if the user switches imagery temporarily -- would have to
see what iD does in that case. One thought -- maybe it would be
good to add "imagery_used" in JOSM with the same behavior as iD,
just so they're consistent. We'd keep adding source, but
imagery_used would be there as a fallback. Task validators can
also check for a source tag, since a task usually specifies a set
of imagery.
-- Pat
_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org <mailto:HOT@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
--
Satoshi IIDA
mail: nyamp...@gmail.com <mailto:nyamp...@gmail.com>
twitter: @nyampire
_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
_______________________________________________
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
