That's a great option. I've used hugo, snd i recall liking it but yesh i think it had weirdness with markdown. If Jekyll avoids that, id take a look at that.
On 4 April 2019 8:25:27 AM NZDT, "Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)" <hackerpublicra...@clacke.user.lysator.liu.se> wrote: >On Thu, Apr 4, 2019, 02:38 Ken Fallon <k...@fallon.ie> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Do any of you have a recommendation for a Static Site Generators that >> just publishes html files. >> >> For example takes a page, adds a header and footer from somewhere and >> publishes the combined page. >> > >I think most of them would be able to be used like that. The ones I >have >come close to are ikiwiki, Jekyll, Hugo and Styx, and basically, >although >they ship with more advanced frameworks, themes and functionality, ans >support various markups, in the end it boils down to what you >described. >Header, body, footer is simply a barebones theme. > >Probably Jekyll is the simplest, with the least configuration to do. >And >HTML is valid markdown, so you don't have to worry about that either. >IIRC >it doesn't support markdown syntax inside html syntax, so you wouldn't >even >need to worry about any unexpected interference. > >-- > /c > >>
_______________________________________________ Hpr mailing list Hpr@hackerpublicradio.org http://hackerpublicradio.org/mailman/listinfo/hpr_hackerpublicradio.org
