On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 08:02:04AM -0700, Bart van Andel wrote:
>
> Could this be a problem with a 360 degree pano where the initial FOV
Maybe. But what I've seen happen is that an image is rotated by 180
degrees and then with pitch=180 it ends up "behind the camera", just
like it would have with just roll=180.
Or are you guys discussing a different situation?
It does look weird, with a sequence of images nicely in order with an
almost constant change in one of the parameters, and then a sudden
"outlier".
I think that restricting the range of some parameters (pitch should be
-90 - +90) AFTER the optimization will help (If you do it during the
optimization, images will get stuck at the borders.)
Roger.
--
** r.e.wo...@bitwizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 **
** Delftechpark 26 2628 XH Delft, The Netherlands. KVK: 27239233 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
Q: It doesn't work. A: Look buddy, doesn't work is an ambiguous statement.
Does it sit on the couch all day? Is it unemployed? Please be specific!
Define 'it' and what it isn't doing. --------- Adapted from lxrbot FAQ
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
