A strange frame which I can't edit to look like the previous frame from the 20090705 eit 195 mpeg clip. Shows Hi luminance on the suns' rim -and some blacked out areas on the original.
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/40308...@n03/3720604543/"; title="Solar frameHiLum07-09 by trevg1, on Flickr"><img src="http:// farm4.static.flickr.com/3483/3720604543_acd9405ed9.jpg" width="500" height="500" alt="Solar frameHiLum07-09" /></a> On Jul 14, 5:36 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > Looking at the earlier filmed period showing 'direct at earth' > activity -http://lasco-www.nrl.navy.mil/daily_mpg/090704_eit_195.mpg > There's nearly 30 mins gap between consecutive clips of solar activity > at a time when one would need to be looking for a CME to hit earth > around the 7th July. > At 04 14:48 you can see CMEs occur on the main spot at about 3 o'clock > (large circular) & 7 o'clock(streamer) both lasting about 5 hours but > another, pretty intense too, at 11 o'clock takes only ONE hour to > flare and disperse- starting @ 04 20:36 > Any of these are capable of causing problems, given our vulnerabilty > to such events. > > Now, if only we had quality data like this on Hum ! > > On Jul 14, 4:57 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Try this direct > > link:http://sohodata.nascom.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/soho_movie_theater > > select C2 or C3 option and put the dates in for search. > > Another, which speaks for > > itself:http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/pickoftheweek/195spot_lo.mov > > The weather in UK is back to summer, quite warm but not as > > previous ,which suits me. > > Some heavy downpours in between- and no CTs I'm glad to report. > > > On the missing data, I'm puzzled as to why that might be witheld, > > given that the aftermath of anything but extremely short lived flares > > would show up on the shot after, which is shown. > > ie:It would be preceding (to the right) that big one shown on the 7th. > > Not being up on these matters leaves me disadvantaged- but this event > > certainly throws a few flags up on the topic. > > There remains the possibility that one or more short sharp flares > > directed straight at earth could have occured and died down quickly. > > It's not size that matters here- it's where is a goin' ! > > Maybe the missing data will be hunted down now or explained in some > > way. > > All credit to Dr Salla for pointing out this anomaly as well as the > > original report. > > > On Jul 14, 1:17 pm, snowcountry <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Interesting Trev! > > > The second site sohodata came up error on page. > > > How's everyones weather? We should be hot and dry here with > > > occasional afternoon thunderstorms, instead its been on the cold side > > > at night and thunderstorms rolling thru mornings. (had one day > > > recently where they started early afternoon and kept rolling thru til > > > the middle of the night) > > > > On Jul 14, 4:56 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote:- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
