I've put 2 adjacent frames from the SOHO clip on our files here. The
Hi one shows a strange bright frame as supplied- and I can't duplicate
the same intensity of the fringe of the sun using manipulation on the
previous quieter frame.
There are blacked out areas too- these files are processed- but all
the same it looks strange to see such an out of balance shot in a
professional outfit.

On Jul 14, 5:36 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote:
> Looking at the earlier filmed period showing 'direct at earth'
> activity -http://lasco-www.nrl.navy.mil/daily_mpg/090704_eit_195.mpg
> There's nearly 30 mins gap between consecutive clips of solar activity
> at a time when one would need to be looking for a CME to hit earth
> around the 7th July.
> At 04 14:48 you can see CMEs occur on the main spot at about 3 o'clock
> (large circular) &  7 o'clock(streamer) both lasting about 5 hours but
> another,  pretty intense too, at 11 o'clock takes only ONE hour to
> flare and disperse- starting @ 04 20:36
> Any of these are capable of causing problems, given our vulnerabilty
> to such events.
>
> Now, if only we had quality data like this on Hum !
>
> On Jul 14, 4:57 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Try this direct 
> > link:http://sohodata.nascom.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/soho_movie_theater
> > select C2 or C3 option and put the dates in for search.
> > Another, which speaks for 
> > itself:http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/pickoftheweek/195spot_lo.mov
> > The weather in UK is back to summer, quite warm but not as
> > previous ,which suits me.
> > Some heavy downpours in between- and no CTs I'm glad to report.
>
> > On the missing data, I'm puzzled as to why that might be witheld,
> > given that the aftermath of anything but extremely short lived flares
> > would show up on the shot after, which is shown.
> > ie:It would be preceding (to the right) that big one shown on the 7th.
> > Not being up on these matters leaves me disadvantaged- but this event
> > certainly throws a few flags up on the topic.
> > There remains the possibility that one or more short sharp flares
> > directed straight at earth could have occured and died down quickly.
> > It's not size that matters here- it's where is a goin' !
> > Maybe the missing data will be hunted down now or explained in some
> > way.
> > All credit to Dr Salla for pointing out this anomaly as well as the
> > original report.
>
> > On Jul 14, 1:17 pm, snowcountry <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Interesting Trev!
> > > The second site sohodata came up error on page.
> > > How's everyones weather?  We should be hot and dry here with
> > > occasional afternoon thunderstorms, instead its been on the cold side
> > > at night and thunderstorms rolling thru mornings. (had one day
> > > recently where they started early afternoon and kept rolling thru til
> > > the middle of the night)
>
> > > On Jul 14, 4:56 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote:- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum 
Sufferers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to