The banning, as far as I know , is to do with ELF/Infrasound uses in crowd control. I'll wager this covers audio freqs. though typically lower in practice. I think some trials were down early on in real life and the results were pretty disasterous. Some claim microwaves were blasted at the peace camps when Cruise was set up- wouldn't surprise me- but it wopuldn't happen now people are more clued up. I don't think the Gov't of any hue can be trusted either in what they will do, or cover up ,in the National Interest. [Nice one ,that]. I'm not going to research every comment- but the microwave pulses that are about get by this broad agreement on a technicality in that they are a by product of channel switching in something like Tetra in the UK, or GWEN in the US. There is no proof that anyone is beaming voice to skull in the general population nor is hum seen as such by most. The carrier wave would be easily detectable by anyone with a broadband detector. OK, HAARP is in place and long been, with other transmission of similar vein, suspects for hum effects- but ,though they are at u-wave Tx, the effect on us is secondary, as I read it , by ELF oscillations in the earths magnetosphere. This neglects weather effects, but that is not what we're looking at here directly. The other point is you keep mentioning 'Machine Code' as a factor , but humans don't have one- as we're not machines. The code you are looking for hasn't be shown to me yet! Communicator is still Off! Therefore, without claiming to be expert on any factors- it seems to me that ELF hum is actually, well... ELF ! -and some here would say it's not even Electromagnetic in nature.
On Jul 23, 8:51 pm, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > Patty What does dboots put to us mean? > I think we are getting a whole lot put to us. I think they have > been using the > population as guinea pigs for quite a long time. The Hum we hear is > probably > because we are EM sensitive to its sound. > > On Jul 22, 1:43 pm, patty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I was very surprised to find out that they already knew of the effects > > of this technology and went ahead with it anyway. I think we are > > getting dboots put to us. > > > On Jul 22, 2:08 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Microwave hearing is a phenomenon,decribed by human observers as the > > > sensations of buzzing,ticking,hissing,or knocking sounds that > > > orginate > > > within or immediately behind the head. There is no sound > > > propagating > > > through the air like normal sound This technology in its crudest form > > > could be used to distract individuals,refined it could be used to > > > communicate with hostages or hostages takers directly BY MORSE CODE > > > or > > > other message systems, possibly even by voice communication. > > > > A 1998 US Dept of the Army unclassified document. It became > > > unclassified in 2006. Document is an ADDENDUM to the Nonlethal > > > Technologies-Worldwide study (NGIC-1147-101-98) > > > >http://www.slavery.org.uk/Bioeffects_of_Selected_Non-Lethal_Weapons.pdf > > > > THERMOELASTIC EXPANSION STUDY OF OUR COCHLEAR MECHANISM OF HEARING > > > AND > > > MICROWAVE HEARING OF RF PULSED FIELDS > > > technology goes back over 30 years > > > > On Jul 20, 1:12 pm, patty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Oh yeah another clue to capturing the hum sound ( I was checking on > > > > the new ICNIRP 2009 paper just released on their web site) Under > > > > amplitude modulation and microwave auditory effect, around pages 51 > > > > and 52 they stated: a single microwave pulse can be percieved as an > > > > acoustic clicking or knocking sound and a train of microwave pulse to > > > > the head can be sensed as a buzz or audible tune with a pitch > > > > corresponding to the pulse repetition rate....The threshold pressure > > > > is mPa for perception of sound at the cochlea by humans. > > > > > On Jul 19, 3:23 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Perhaps it's intertwined with some form of a sonic device along the > > > > > likes of akin to infrasound generators. Vibrational sound is very > > > > > hard to pin down. Maybe we need something like an infrasound > > > > > detector? Or an electrolytic process device? > > > > > I think John was on to something with what he was trying before > > > > > that had > > > > > to do with trying to capture/record it with it's underlying > > > > > vibrational effects > > > > > that it is also emitting. > > > > > > On Jul 16, 10:18 am, patty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Yep, That's why it hasn't been pinned down yet. Sure is a good way > > > > > > to > > > > > > keep us busy though, why we hopfully go quietly crazy. My hum has > > > > > > progressively changed, the new 4G is a real nuisance, physical side > > > > > > effects are like tripled. > > > > > > > On Jul 15, 3:09 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Do you mean that with a constant hum excitation ,of any means, > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > individuals will always hear a 'personal tone' , designated by > > > > > > > physical characteristics of the hearer, and this is a downplay on > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > specific 'common' hum type ever being highlighted? > > > > > > > My hum is always the same tone , but the period and sub > > > > > > > modulations > > > > > > > may vary , along with the level. > > > > > > > I think this approach would tally with what I've experienced. > > > > > > > > On Jul 15, 7:47 pm, patty <[email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Just wondering whether these factors have been considered in > > > > > > > > recording > > > > > > > > the hum. Because the microwaves are entering thru the skull. > > > > > > > > Each > > > > > > > > person has a different configuration when it comes to the size > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > their head. I also just read Henry Lai's research on the > > > > > > > > neurological > > > > > > > > effects of nonioninzing radiation, University of Washington. He > > > > > > > > stated that they used a hydrophone immersed in a solution (0.15 > > > > > > > > N Kc1) > > > > > > > > having an electrical conductivity similar to that of tissue. > > > > > > > > At least > > > > > > > > this criteria has to be meet. Not to mention all the other > > > > > > > > physical > > > > > > > > differences, cochlear amplification, density of hair cell > > > > > > > > bundles and > > > > > > > > the reaction time to shear force of stimulation not originating > > > > > > > > at the > > > > > > > > outer ear. > > > > > > > > Of course we are all going to have a different perception, life > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > great that way.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
