No parent has the capacity to see a nano sized chip  I sincerely doubt
that I
would be able to see it. You seem to want to play down advancing
technology
  Sorry, but I give credit where credit is due and nothing I typed had
to do with fears, so why the pretense in your response of "whatever
your fears Dee"?

The fact this report got published is something- but there's no
> smoking gun- or you probably wouldn't get a look!.

  Your wrong Trev, that is my opinion.  When a government says they
have the capacity to be 'A VOICE IN ONE'S OWN HEAD" that means
we need to look in another direction for what else has the capacity
to speak our brains chatterings of electrical and chemical impulses
of signals.

  It probably means they don't need the language of a voice anymore.
   It most probably means the HUM is doing the work of the voice in
it's place.

A MACHINE CODE.

  But push ahead with your own fears of not willing to look in the
face
of this possible reality.

http://www.slavery.org.uk/Bioeffects_of_Selected_Non-Lethal_Weapons.pdf


Mechanism to Produce the Desired Effects
After the phenomenon was discovered,several mechanisms were suggested
to explain the hearing of pulsed RF fields. Thermoelastic expansion
with the brain in response to RF
pulses was first studied and demonstrated in inert materials and was
proposed as the mechanism of hearing of pulsed RF fields.


  Sorry Trev, but I have chosen the red pill and I will not swallow
the
blue pill anymore.  I chose awareness rather than plodding along
like it isn't happening.

  It isn't fears.  It's reality that bites the most.

Peace

On Aug 21, 2:06 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think parents would see if chip had been inserted- I know I would.
> On the truth bit- I'm not saying we have true democracy, more an
> elective dictatorship, both sides of the pond,- but falling for
> everything in the worst possible case scenario isn't going to make it
> true, whatever your fears Dee!
> My point about acedemia being shown wanting ,in remi,t is that we
> can't take over that role on here, as  there is a democratic deficit
> identified in society at large.
> The fact this report got published is something- but there's no
> smoking gun- or you probably wouldn't get a look!.
>
> On Aug 12, 11:05 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Trev  Didn't you know, the new in thing is to have your babies
> > chipped?  Rumor has it, the babies are being chipped whether the
> > parents know about it or not.
> >   I wasn't publishing anything Trev, the Dept of the Army was, via a
> > FOIA push to unclassify. What's with this line?  How is a FOIA an
> > academic replacement?
>
> > Sorry Dee, we are searchers after some form of truth here and not
>
> > > academic replacements for a disinterested or even corrupt scientific
> > > establishment.
>
> > What democratic process? Here in the US? LOL- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum 
Sufferers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to