Trev Now you are splitting hairs and making it about something Trivial. WHY? Are you so afraid of that unclassified document or is it you just want to lead others away from it? I have never seen you act in this manner before so I am a little taken aback by your actions.
On Aug 25, 11:00 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > Dee, You may give weight to this report but for something so high > ranking and in depth- it's really strange that nobody corrected the > mistake that hearing range is 20Hz [ rather than 20KHz ] to 16KHz. > If such an obvious howler is left on file for so long- what 'isn't > being said', too? > Smoking Guns are still needed and a few words of admission about > possibilities are not really that impressive. > They state many times long distance is' hundreds of meters'- and RF > can be screened against, as is known. > Hum is generally perceived as long distance and un-screenable. > It's easy to keep throwing up challenges, unspecified- and say if the > respondent can't allay your fears or agree with a general overview, > they are then implicated. > Sticking Peace at the end makes no difference. > If I wanted Peace-I wouldn't try to deal with this at all. > > On Aug 26, 2:18 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > No parent has the capacity to see a nano sized chip I sincerely doubt > > that I > > would be able to see it. You seem to want to play down advancing > > technology > > Sorry, but I give credit where credit is due and nothing I typed had > > to do with fears, so why the pretense in your response of "whatever > > your fears Dee"? > > > The fact this report got published is something- but there's no > > > > smoking gun- or you probably wouldn't get a look!. > > > Your wrong Trev, that is my opinion. When a government says they > > have the capacity to be 'A VOICE IN ONE'S OWN HEAD" that means > > we need to look in another direction for what else has the capacity > > to speak our brains chatterings of electrical and chemical impulses > > of signals. > > > It probably means they don't need the language of a voice anymore. > > It most probably means the HUM is doing the work of the voice in > > it's place. > > > A MACHINE CODE. > > > But push ahead with your own fears of not willing to look in the > > face > > of this possible reality. > > >http://www.slavery.org.uk/Bioeffects_of_Selected_Non-Lethal_Weapons.pdf > > > Mechanism to Produce the Desired Effects > > After the phenomenon was discovered,several mechanisms were suggested > > to explain the hearing of pulsed RF fields. Thermoelastic expansion > > with the brain in response to RF > > pulses was first studied and demonstrated in inert materials and was > > proposed as the mechanism of hearing of pulsed RF fields. > > > Sorry Trev, but I have chosen the red pill and I will not swallow > > the > > blue pill anymore. I chose awareness rather than plodding along > > like it isn't happening. > > > It isn't fears. It's reality that bites the most. > > > Peace > > > On Aug 21, 2:06 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I think parents would see if chip had been inserted- I know I would. > > > On the truth bit- I'm not saying we have true democracy, more an > > > elective dictatorship, both sides of the pond,- but falling for > > > everything in the worst possible case scenario isn't going to make it > > > true, whatever your fears Dee! > > > My point about acedemia being shown wanting ,in remi,t is that we > > > can't take over that role on here, as there is a democratic deficit > > > identified in society at large. > > > The fact this report got published is something- but there's no > > > smoking gun- or you probably wouldn't get a look!. > > > > On Aug 12, 11:05 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Trev Didn't you know, the new in thing is to have your babies > > > > chipped? Rumor has it, the babies are being chipped whether the > > > > parents know about it or not. > > > > I wasn't publishing anything Trev, the Dept of the Army was, via a > > > > FOIA push to unclassify. What's with this line? How is a FOIA an > > > > academic replacement? > > > > > Sorry Dee, we are searchers after some form of truth here and not > > > > > > academic replacements for a disinterested or even corrupt scientific > > > > > establishment. > > > > > What democratic process? Here in the US? LOL- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
