Le sam 14/12/2002 à 18:05, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : > I posted a reworked layout at : > > http://mapage.noos.fr/nmailhot/fr-latin9-pc > > (the original layout is available at : > http://mapage.noos.fr/nmailhot/fr-latin9) > > Basically I took the xfree fr layout and modified it till it matched the > layout I wanted. While doing this I tweaked a bit the original fr-latin9 > layout (matched euro and cent with fr, removed duplicate guillemots to > add doublequotemarks). I didn't change much since this is a very > well-thought design and there is little room for improvements.
> This layout do not depend on pc/latin ; in fact there is quite a bit of > overlapping, but there is almost no key where all the four symbols > match. So I dumped the latin include ; and I see no point of defining a > new latin core that will be only used by this layout. However if one was ready to dump the design decision of making all accented letters available without dead keys (since they seem to be well supported by applications these days) one could easily produce a light version of this layout that would share a lot more with the others. In fact whoever maintains the X fr layout should probably do this, since all other changes (except the square keys) are merely fixups of this layout. I wouldn't use it, accented letters replace symbols largely unused in french and I find them more convenient than dead keys, but I suppose some people would find it interesting. > All the original fr-latin9 part that defined <F1> <F2> and so on was > dumped. As a consequence, arrows do not work any longer in vi while num-lock is activated. I suppose the Xfree86 rules are borked somewhere and no one ever bothered to report/fix it (like « and » not being next to each other in the X fr layout) Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
