I know that using dynamic proclibs gives you the ability to change the proclib concatenations dynamically and also the ability to rebuild pointers if a library has gone into extents or been compressed.
My shop uses static concatenations. We haven't needed to change the proclib concatenations in several years and JCL can be used to rebuild JES2's pointers if needed. I'd like to convert to dynamic proclibs because it seems more modern and cooler. But I wonder if it's really necessary for my installation and maybe I'd just be doing work for work's sake. Any opinions? Am I missing some benefits? Luke Rabbe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
