Luke Rabbe of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu> wrote on 11/23/2009 07:54:28 AM:
> I know that using dynamic proclibs gives you the ability to change > the proclib concatenations dynamically and also the ability to > rebuild pointers if a library has gone into extents or been compressed. > > My shop uses static concatenations. We haven't needed to change the > proclib concatenations in several years and JCL can be used to > rebuild JES2's pointers if needed. I'd like to convert to dynamic > proclibs because it seems more modern and cooler. But I wonder if > it's really necessary for my installation and maybe I'd just be > doing work for work's sake. > > Any opinions? Am I missing some benefits? One benefit of JCLLIB might be reduced search time for a procedure. Another might be documentation when looking for the source of the PROC. Regards, John K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
