On 26 April 2010 19:02, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
<shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net> wrote:
> In <4bd491ce.5010...@ync.net>, on 04/25/2010
>   at 02:02 PM, Rick Fochtman <rfocht...@ync.net> said:
>
>>I suspect that 2305 was an outgrowth of the 2302, not necessarily a
>>"new" device.
>
> I don't have any information on that, although the platters certainly
> looked similar to those on the 1301, 1302 and 2302.

Where did the 2301 fit in? IIRC that was a true drum. We had one in
the early 1970s on MVT on both a /65 and a /165, but support was
dropped in MVS.

>>The 2305 was available with selector channel interfaces
>>before the blk-mux interfaces. At NCSS we were told that it took a
>>complete selector subchannel, with eight "exposures", to function
>>properly so we configured them (16 devices) to run off 2860 Selector
>>channels hanging off a 370/168 system.
>
> The 2880 was first announced for the S/360; the S/370 was not announced
> until 1970, a year after the 360/85, and the original announcement did not
> include the 370/168. I'd guess that your management simply did not want to
> spend the money on a 2880.

The 2880 wasn't announced for all S/360 models, though. In S/370
architecture there is a block multiplexing control bit in Control
Register 0. S/360 had no architected control registers (yeah, I know -
the /67 did), but perhaps they added them on the /85 and /195?

Tony H.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to