On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 03:50:18 -0400, Jim Mulder wrote: > > IEATTIME (service routine for TIME and STCKCONV) and >IEATCNVT(service routine for CONVTOD) currently do not process the >high order byte of an ETOD value. > Thanks. And a while back I went to the trouble of writing a program to test STCKCONV and determine this, when I needed merely to ask you.
Still left unspecified, not even hinted, about the high order byte is whether it might be interpreted as signed, supporting extension to pre-1900. YYYYY>9999? Julian calendar? Proleptic Gregorian? BCE? Ugh. Thanks again, gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
