On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 00:36:14 +0000, john gilmore wrote: >Others have dealt with the substance of Paul Gilmartin's post. I will limit >myself to noting that its content is both preposterous and contrary to much >IBM documentation. > Preposterous? Because I agree with a passage in the PoOp and with empirical observation of the behavior of STCKCONV, but not with your conjecture? Hardly.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
