On 23 Sep 2010 07:29:51 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: >Hi John, > > Yes, I had thought of extrapolating channel busy % but I'm not sure that > would be precise enough. >Thanks for the suggestion.
As I recall the SMF 14 (sequential read) and 15 (sequential write) records have the device type and probably the address. EXCPs times blocksize should give a decent approximation and taking all of the records for a given 24 hour period should give a fair idea of the number of bytes per day. Clark Morris > >Thank You, >Dave O'Brien >NIH Contractor >________________________________________ >From: McKown, John [john.mck...@healthmarkets.com] >Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 10:25 AM >To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu >Subject: Re: Reports for GB per hour to tape > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List >> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of O'Brien, David W. >> (NIH/CIT) [C] >> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 9:21 AM >> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu >> Subject: Re: Reports for GB per hour to tape >> >> Hi Rex, >> >> Thanks for responding. No, we have TMS (CA-1) as our tape >> management system. >> Guess I had a senior moment earlier. The number of bytes >> written or read would obviously only be available at the end >> of the job. GB/hour is just not available for any job running >> past :59 of any hour. Management is not looking for GB/hour >> of a particular job but rather the entire workload. >> >> Guess we'll just have to test a s/w encryption product to find out. >> >> Thank You, >> Dave O'Brien >> NIH Contractor > >Are your tapes on dedicated channels? What about an RMF channel (or device) >utilization report? Just guessing! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
