The last PMAP (or whatever it is called now) I looked at showed that the Cobol code generator was not even using relative branching.
IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu> wrote on 07/14/2011 02:04:37 PM: > From: "Vernooij, CP - SPLXM" <kees.verno...@klm.com> > So, since it is Cobol, would just a recompile with a recent compiler be > sufficient to generate an efficient loadmodule? > We discussed a similar issue internally recently with regards to the new > instructions that are available on today's machines and were not 10 or > 20 years ago when an old module was compiled. Also for this reason, > recompiling it could make it more efficient. ----------------------------------------- The information contained in this communication (including any attachments hereto) is confidential and is intended solely for the personal and confidential use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or unauthorized use of this information, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. Thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html