Depends on what is scheduling and to what. For example, if a PC-SS is scheduling to the primary, there is no need to place the SRB code in CSA.
Or if the service routine address is saved in some CSA control block. But if some AS wishes to run some code in an arbitrary AS it will need to do it thru CSA. Also, unless you explicitly request that the SRB complain, it will fail silently with neither the SCHEDULEr or the target address space being informed. On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 18:00:13 -0400 Tom Harper <tom.har...@neon.com> wrote: :>Michael, :> :>I would say yes. One of the not so obvious advantages is that if the target address space goes away, it does not take your code with it. :> :>Tom :> :>----- Original Message ----- :>From: Micheal Butz [mailto:michealb...@optonline.net] :>Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 05:53 PM :>To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu <IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu> :>Subject: Re: SRBEPA :> :>The normal sequence then is common when scheduling to a different address :>space :> :>-----Original Message----- :>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf :>Of Tom Harper :>Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 3:39 PM :>To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu :>Subject: Re: SRBEPA :> :>Michael, :> :>If the target address space is the scheduling address space, then it is :>easily possible. :> :>Or, if the target address space is a different address space, it could have :>passed the address of the SRB routine earlier. :> :>But, if you are scheduling into an arbitrary address space, placing the code :>in common is certainly simpler. :> :>Your questions are asking "what is possible". Perhaps you might be asking :>what is best practice, or, even better, tell us what you are trying to :>accomplish. :> :>Tom :> :>----- Original Message ----- :>From: Micheal Butz [mailto:michealb...@optonline.net] :>Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 03:30 PM :>To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu <IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu> :>Subject: Re: SRBEPA :> :>How can something be addressable in the target address space if is not in :>common :> :> :> :>-----Original Message----- :>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf :>Of Binyamin Dissen :>Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 7:36 AM :>To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu :>Subject: Re: SRBEPA :> :>On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 07:09:07 -0400 Micheal Butz <michealb...@optonline.net> :>wrote: :> :>:>Thats what I thought there was a :>:>Document XMEM for beginners which said both the SRB and SRB rtn EPA have :>to be in common :> :>The routine only has to be addressable in the target address space. :> :>:>On Oct 16, 2011, at 6:46 AM, Tom Harper <tom.har...@neon.com> wrote: :> :>:>> No, it does not. :> :>:>> ----- Original Message ----- :>:>> From: Micheal Butz [mailto:michealb...@optonline.net] :>:>> Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 06:04 AM :>:>> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu <IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu> :>:>> Subject: SRBEPA :> :>:>> Does anyone know if the SRB rtn has to live common -- Binyamin Dissen <bdis...@dissensoftware.com> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
