On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Chris Craddock <crashlu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Sam Siegel <s...@pscsi.net> wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Chris Craddock <crashlu...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Micheal Butz <michealb...@optonline.net >> >wrote: >> <snip> On the other hand; If you are trying to schedule an SRB into >> -any-other- >> > address space, then (somehow) you have to make sure the code will be >> > addressable when the SRB is dispatched. In general that means loading it >> > into common storage (technically it should be in SQA rather than CSA, but >> > that's a minor nit) >> >> I'm curious on the technical distinction between putting the SRB code >> in SQA versus CSA. >> >> Can you elaborate? > > > > (E)SQA has the correct storage attributes. (E)SQA is key zero and page > fixed. You should never load SRB code into anything but key zero and the > code should never be paged out, hence my use of the term SQA as a technical > nit. You -can- make appropriate choices of subpool and macro options to get > equivalent attributes from (E)CSA and if (as usual) there's no SQA available > VSM will give you CSA equivalent anyway - known as SQA "overflowing" to > CSA.
Thanks for all of the details. Cheers, Sam > > > -- > This email might be from the > artist formerly known as CC > (or not) You be the judge. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
