Phil, I thought you'd give them a bit longer than that based on your earlier post. Even Mike the Chicken got 18 months!!! :-)
Rex -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil Payne Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 9:44 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: FW: The PSI Letter V4 I'm not sure how many receive the PSI Newsletter, but in case you don't, I've appended the V4 text. There's nothing new in it - it's amazing how many people think they can re-boil old material and dupe gullible reporters. (One copy is enough, guys!) I may be proved wrong. I believe it's happened before, but I can't remember the last occasion. Nothing adds up with PSI. Nothing. I hear random, unsupported comments - supposedly from IBM executives - about PSI "never getting license agreements because we don't deal with patent infringers". And yet PSI exudes confidence. (And on a quite personal note, trying to avoid ad hominems - was it Greg or Simon? Those who know both will know what I mean.) I was sceptical about Hercules. I got slimed for it, but I was right. I was sceptical about UMX. I got slimed for it, but I was right. Not a bad average. I'm sceptical about PSI. Not just about their access to licenses, but especially about their I/O capability, and especially about that in relation to the 66xx. They know what I mean. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
