On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 15:04 -0500, Ed Finnell wrote: > > Remember one large shop gave a user benchmark(late eighties) with and > without PR/SM and it was near 30% overhead on a 400J.
Muggs- they should have used Amdahl kit, then they could have benefited from MDF .... :o) Anyway back to Antons questions. Presumably the Linux LPAR is running on the 2 IFLs. It is not a consideration in performance terms at 110%. To all intents and purposes it is running dedicated (unless there is a VM LPAR we don't know about lurking around), and below capacity. That leaves 2 engines for the other 5 LPARs - with at least one having two logical engines defined. Makes for a bad logical~physical ratio. So ... as the others have said, get the number of MVS LPARs down. Shane ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
