This is a call to all the XEDIT freaks that have been punking ISPF the last
few days to put your money where your mouth is and submit some SHARE
requirements for the ISPF editor. I get sick and tired of all the XEDIT
freaks saying how XEDIT is way better than ISPF, but they never back it up
with specifics. If XEDIT was so great, submit requirements for ISPF so we
can get the features you want into the ISPF editor. Maybe XEDIT was better
because it used " and "" for Repeat and RRepeat block, or maybe it was
because copy and move targets used F for Following instead of A for After or
P for Preceding instead of B for Before. Real productive.
So quit B&M'ing about how ISPF sucks compared to XEDIT, and submit some
requirements. If not, STF up.
Regards,
Tom Conley
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
