You still pursued getting the IPLA sub-cap agreement signed, didn't you?

While you won't get any money back, it proves to IBM that you are now
*over entitled*. It took me three years to grow into the entitlement I
already owned when I got that sub-cap agreement signed. 

Plus, if you get any *new* IPLA, they ARE ELIGIBLE for sub-cap!

Bob Richards 


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kelman, Tom
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 1:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: WLC, WLM and all the rest: how optimize them ?

And just to add to Bob's excellent explanation, as always.  If you've
just upgraded your hardware and didn't have the IPLA agreement in place
you probably got extra entitlement based on the full capacity of the
processor.  In that case you're stuck, because as was stated in a
previous post IBM doesn't give it back.  We ran into that with out
upgrade last June from a 620 MIPS processor to a 1004 MIPS processor. We
signed the agreement for EWLC licensing but didn't know about the need
for a separate IPLA agreement. So now we are paying full price for our
IPLA products.    

Tom Kelman 
  
  
  
LEGAL DISCLAIMER 
The information transmitted is intended solely for the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. 
Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking action in 
reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended 
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please 
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. 
  
SunTrust and Seeing beyond money are federally registered service marks of 
SunTrust Banks, Inc. 
[ST:XCL]

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to