Anton, 

I am not in a stage I have to select an Enterprise database. I just wondered
IF (Adabas is faster, as I was told) and WHY (IBM and others don't ask for
TPC tests for Mainframe DBs). 

Should I regret asking that? 

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Anton Britz
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 6:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ADABAS vs IMS vs DB2 Who is faster?

Hi,

Phew... why did I not just stay out of this in the first place ?

Ok...as Andy Rooney said on 60 minutes, "All we need is a leader with
integrity, can listen and make reasonably conclusions"... so let me try and
do some of this :

You are suppose to first find out why people are asking you the question
but I am going to skip that part and just assume I am in a bar , after a
football game and somebody  just wants to show he knows something..

The Questions that was asked in this thread :

a) I spoke few days ago with an ADABAS specialist that claimed that ADABAS
is much faster and has low overhead compared to IMS and DB2

Answer : Yes

b) The relative speed that is important is the one for *YOUR* workload.
Anything else is meaningless noise. Thoroughly research the *features*
important to you and go with the product that provides the best feature to
price ratio for you.

Answer : Yes.. from a Capacity point of view.. when you are thinking of 
upgrading your CPU.   This argument is not applicable to the original
question

c) IMS is a hierarchal database, and thus uses vastly different data
storage/retrieval paradigms when compared to ADABAS or DB2.

Answer : True but again, that is not what the original requestor wanted to
know.

d) "ADABAS  doesn't scale to
really large applications the way DB2 does and it doesn't let you keep the
database up while some portion of the database is having utilities run."

Not true.. I know of some sites that could not convert Adabas Databases to
DB2.  IBM kids told them to convert but after 6 months decided they need
other IBM kids to help them and kept the data in Adabas.

e) Moral Compass ?

Answer: I said enough about this posting

f) Did I stumble into a dark closet and find myself trapped in a job
interview?

Answer : No, you are in a bar and everybody thinks they are experts and
wants to be treated as such and you contributed to making this discussion a
bar environment. Get you self a beer from the barman... She is Blonde and
she would love to talk to people like you.

g) ADABAS fully supports a sysplex and can actually scale quite well ?

Answer: Kelly, your Mother should be proud of you but it depends who asks
the question and if they really know what a SYSPLEX is etc. etc. etc.

h) I wonder why TPC-C tests are only done for the distributed platforms
databases (or their DP versions). Within its members are IBM, Oracle (MF
version) Sybase(the same) and others. Maybe, because TPC heard (too early, I
must say) that the mainframe is dead? 

Answer: Because that is where the cooperates are spending money these days.
Not sure why you are still in the "Which Database should I run on my
Mainframe" stage.. Everybody wants to make the Mainframe data available to
the WEB at this point or they want to run applications on "cheap"
distributed Operating Systems ex. Like my DVR's at home.. it's all Motorola
DCH6416 boxes and if you go to the Motorola Web site, they allow you to
write Java 
applications for the DVR in you house.   IN YOUR HOUSE.

http://broadband.motorola.com/dvr/

Summary: In any case, as I said in my opening statement ,you need to first
find out why you are being asked the question and I did not do that but very
few of us really know what Israel is up too these days. 

Enough said...  and this is my last posting, for those that had enough of
this serious talk in a bar.

Anton Britz


On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:50:30 -0400, Jon Brock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>. . . except that you haven't done anything to answer the original 
>question, from Itschak: " I spoke few days ago with an ADABAS 
>specialist that claimed that ADABAS is much faster and has low overhead 
>compared to IMS and DB2. Is this true?"

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the
archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to