IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU> wrote on 04/11/2008 01:11:14 AM: > I was quite unaware, > though (or didn't read it properly because I didn't want to > subconsciously), that GRS collection is a global exit. I would have > sworn it is local. > > I just tested with grsq set to contention and the capture time > decreased drastically. So let my scars be a warning to you! :-) > Guess I need to say goodbye to that debugging help for the sake of > 20s gain in production. (That means we can go back to q=yes, though!)
We are painfully aware of the requirement to move GRSQ processing to occur after system nondispatchability has been reset. We can't just change that GRS exit to be a local exit, because then it would run for each address space being dumped, and we only want it to run once per dump. > (using another Jim-Mulder- > Special, LISTTOD) LISTTOD is a Bob Wright special. You are thinking of the local (to Poughkeepsie System Test) VERBX CNVTOD, which we used before LISTTOD existed. Jim Mulder z/OS System Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie, NY ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
