Same here, Alan. I LIKE betting on a sure thing! In my old shop, it took
8 years!
Staller, Allan wrote:
<snip>
Pragmatically, there is a pretty good business case for halting the 1.9
project. The costs become an issue if, and only if, the project fails,
runs over schedule, or turns out to be only partially successful.
</snip>
Riiiggghhhhtttt! I would place a bet on failure given the time frame
proposed (< 6 months)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
