In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 07/17/2008
at 02:21 AM, "William H. Blair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Regardless, IT'S STILL DOCUMENTED TO WORK THE OLD WAY. Since it is hard
>for me to believe that this behavior is not intentional, you probably
>have as your only recourse a Readers' Comments form submission
His proper recourse is to open a PMR.
>This is clearly an intentional change in behavior,
Perhaps, but that doesn't guaranty that IBM will reject an APAR. It's
broken as designed (BAD).
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
