In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
07/17/2008
at 12:05 PM, "Gibney, Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I guess this shouldn't have changed for the sake of backass
>compatibility. But, I've always been bothered (and debugged application
>JCL) when overrides didn't match the order in procs (and the messages
>there were almost non-existent).
IBM distributed procs that depended on the old behavior four decades ago.
The change is just dumb.
> Folks relying in //SYSIN DD * GENERATED STATEMENT are getting what
>they deserve. :)
Others have reported that the bug occurs even if the DD * is explicit, and
the APAR text confirms that.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
