>RMF III also shows the storage in number of frames (the STORF display). >But at least it used K and not T.
So, RMF III uses the ambiguous 'K' and fails to put a definition in the help. 'K' could mean 1000 and it could mean 1024. If it's 1024, then without using a calculator and in less than 2 seconds, how many frames if 635K? In what way is that better than using 'T', when 'T' clearly means 1000? How many frames is 635T? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
