SAS/MXG on a non-mainframe platform is actually pretty inexpensive.  At
a prior employer, I did just that along with MXG running on SUSE linux
on Intel.  For us, it ran faster than on the mainframe.   It was a small
shop, so there was not an overabundance of SMF data.

As for your question of rolling your own via JAVA, sounds like a
fulltime job.

_________________________________________________________________
Dave Jousma
Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services
david.jou...@53.com
1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI  49546 MD RSCB1G
p 616.653.8429
f 616.653.8497

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of John McKown
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 1:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: insanity? process SMF with Java on non-z?

We are losing our SAS license. Cost containment. We are looking at
getting
our main SAS user a Window desktop license so that he can continue to
use
MXG. Apparently this is fairly popular.

But I was curious if anybody has ever used anything else, such as Java,
to
process SMF data on a Windows or Linux box? Or is that just too crazy?

--

This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be 
privileged.   It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you 
receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any 
manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please 
reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was 
misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your 
assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to