On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 09:11 -0800, Lloyd Fuller wrote: > There were several of us working on the SHARE requirements.
I've kept the mailing list for the requirements committee, and there are 79 names on it - including yours and Shmuel's. There was a lot of interest in the SLAC mods at the time. > And, yes, there were one or two that IBM implemented differently I vaguely recall that IBM changed the "active USINGs" display, which took some getting used to. According to John, IBM ended up overhauling the assembler, cleaning it up a great deal. The new HLASM product was more ambitious than the SLAC code-lift that people asked for; lobbying for the SLAC mods made opening the moribund ASMH possible. -- David Andrews A. Duda & Sons, Inc. david.andr...@duda.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
