Ah, yes; not only more charitable, but more likely. Thank you. --- Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313
/* You know what I did before I married? Anything I wanted to. -Henny Youngman */ -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2021 21:01 -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Bob Bridges Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2021 3:22 PM Going out on a limb, here, but either your boss was an arrant liar (which you did not suggest), or she never wrote a COBOL program of more than 30 or 40 lines in the PROCEDURE DIVISION. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of Tom Brennan Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 13:41 Good to hear! During that time one of my other supervisors/teachers would tell me about her application experience. She said no matter how complex her COBOL programs were, they would not only compile first time but would run perfectly. This of course was due to her rigorous desk-checking which I assume took days. I remember thinking "that's crazy" but I just kept quiet. I'll give her a break because that could have been at the time of card punching where such desk-checking made far more sense. --- On 8/18/2021 10:23 AM, Frank Swarbrick wrote: > I program that way to this day. (Lots of compiles of small changes, > that is.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
