>Think "Black Team". Sorry, but that is not relevant. We try not to waste time and resources implementing things that no one needs (with less than 100% success, I'm sure). It is not a question of exercising the outlying cases of an implementation trying to break something.
>Should I infer from this that only symbol substitution by instream data >set processing occurs, and if the PARMDD data set is not instream >no symbol processing is possible? Yes you should. There is no intrinsic support in "GET" to ask for and/or get symbol substitution; it is only in JES instream data set processing (not a great state of affairs, in my opinion) >[S]hortly before the jobstep program >attach" sounds far too late for JES JCL symbol substitution. Perhaps I am missing something. Why would it be "too late"? It is before the program gets control. It is after the JCL symbol values are known. Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN