Larre,

You need to have TSOAUTH MOUNT authority in order to mount tape volumes
under TSO. I used the RACF terminology and my understanding is that you use
TSS. the names are the same, the commands to grant the authority is
different.

ITschak

ITschak Mugzach
Z/OS, ISV Products and Application Security & Risk Assessments Professional

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:57 PM, Hardee, Chuck <chuck.har...@thermofisher.com
> wrote:

> Larry,
>
> I just created a REXX exec to read a tape, submitted it to batch and it
> requested, mounted and read the tape as expected and the EXECIO ended with
> a return code of zero.
>
> So, mounting tapes is possible in TSO/Batch.
>
> However, having said that, I am JES2 not JES3.
>
> Chuck
>
> The REXX:
> /* rexx */
> "alloc fi(tapefile) da('S01CH.PRDC0904.SYS002') SHR"
> "execio 10 diskr tapefile (stem taprecs. fini)"
> say rc
>
> The Tape:
>
> -----------------------------   CA 1 TAPE INQUIRY
> ----------------------------
>
> Data Set Name . . . : S01CH.PRDC0904.SYS002
>
> General Data                         Creation Information
>  Volume Serial. . . : 321526          Date . . . . . . : 2014/247
>  Alternate Volume . :                 Time . . . . . . : 09:02:00
>  Media type   . . . : 3590-128X       Jobname  . . . . : S01CHUNL
>  Record Format. . . : VB              Program  . . . . : IDMSBCF
>  Record Length. . . : 32756          Last Used Information
>  Block Size   . . . : 32760           Date . . . . . . : 2015/091
>  Number of blocks . : 12320           Time . . . . . . : 13:51:00
>  Percent utilized . : 0               Jobname  . . . . : S01CHTSO
>  Batch ID/Hook ID . : CLOSE IO       Expiration Information
>  Status   . . . . . : ACTIVE          Expire Date. . . : CATALOG
>
> File  / Volume Set                   Vault Management Information
>  Base Volume. . . . : 321526          Outcode. . . . . :
>  Sequence Number. . : 1               Slot   . . . . . : 0000000
>  Total Files in Set : 1               Outdate. . . . . :
> Secondary volumes:
> USER DATA:
>
> The job:
> //S01CHTSO JOB (99CH,8310,,9000),'REXX', TYPRUN=SCAN,
> //         CLASS=A,MSGCLASS=X,USER=S01CH
> //         JCLLIB ORDER=S01CH.INCLUDE.JCLLIB
> /*JOBPARM LINES=999999
> /*JOBPARM PAGES=999999
> //*
> // INCLUDE MEMBER=TSOBATCH
> //ISPPROF  DD DISP=SHR,DSN=S01CH.BATCH.IPO2.ISPPROF
> //SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=*
> //SYSTSIN  DD *
>  profile plang(enu) slang(enu)
>  %testtape
>
> The output:
> ACF0C038 ACF2 LOGONID ATTRIBUTES HAVE REPLACED DEFAULT USER ATTRIBUTES
> READY
>  profile plang(enu) slang(enu)
> READY
>  %testtape
> 0
> READY
> END
>
> Charles (Chuck) Hardee
> Senior Systems Engineer/Database Administration
> EAS Information Technology
>
> Thermo Fisher Scientific
> 300 Industry Drive | Pittsburgh, PA 15275
> Phone +1 (724) 517-2633 | Mobile +1 (412) 877-2809 | FAX: +1 (412) 490-9230
> chuck.har...@thermofisher.com | www.thermofisher.com
>
> WORLDWIDE CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: Dissemination, distribution or copying of
> this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended
> recipient, or an employee or agent of a system responsible for delivering
> the message to the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please inform the sender and delete all copies.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Larre Shiller
> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 1:41 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: dynamic allocation for tape using TSO in batch
>
> Hello -
>
> Please excuse the lack of detail in this post... I'm not a COBOL
> programmer and quite a bit of what is happening here is either outside of
> my scope of understanding and experience or I have no way to directly test
> some of this.   There are quite a few "moving parts" involved and I'm not
> sure which one may be the culprit.
>
> We have a production batch job that executes DB2 and a COBOL program using
> TSO in batch (IKJEFT1A).  The COBOL program dynamically allocates DASD data
> sets as input using PUTENV and standard COBOL SELECT and OPEN statements.
> The COBOL program uses the CATALOG to get the data set names it is
> interested in uses the DSN to do the OPEN.  This has been working for
> years.  Unfortunately, some of the input data sets chaned from DASD data
> sets to TAPE data sets and the job is now getting "failure to allocate"
> messages:
>
> IKJ56221I DATA SET FOO.BAR NOT ALLOCATED, VOLUME NOT AVAILABLE+
>
> IKJ56221I VOLUME  NECESSARY TO SATISFY YOUR REQUEST NOT ON SYSTEM, AND
> CANNOT BE MOUNTED
>
> ...and since we are a JES3 shop, this one gets thrown in as well:
>
> IEF295I FOO.BAR - VOLUME MOUNTING NOT ALLOWED BUT IS NEEDED BY JES3
> INITIALIZATION
>
> I find the IEF295I message (and descriptive text) to be especially cryptic
> and confusing.  I'm not quite sure what failure to mount a volume has to do
> with "JES3 INITIALIZATION", but I suspect the message is probably just
> ancient and poorly worded...
>
> I opened a PMR with IBM, but the essence of what I'm getting back just
> boils down to "...you can't mount a tape from a batch job executing
> TSO...".  And although that certainly seems to be the case here, I guess
> I'm just skeptical.  And I can't seem to find that blanket restriction
> specifically documented anywhere.
>
> I have found numerous other "can I dynamically allocate a data set from a
> COBOL program" posts on the Interwebs and I have read quite a few of them,
> but none of them specifically mention tape--at least not the ones that I
> can find.  And one would think that if that were a restriction, it would
> have been discussed or mentioned in at least *one* of them...!  But maybe
> not.  We even tried adding a TSO segment to the batch userID and gave it
> MOUNT authority, but that did not help.  It seems awfully odd that there is
> no way to permit this, if this is indeed a default behavior/restriction...
> after all, even with the TSO restriction, you can still override it with
> UADS or TSOAUTH...!
>
> I guess I'm just looking for definitive confirmation one way or the other
> and was hoping that somebody would have specific knowledge or experience
> here.
>
> Thanks for any help...
>
> Larre Shiller
> US Social Security Administration
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to